Trickle Down — Hypothesis vs. Theory

My last post used a tag that read “Trickle Down Hypothesis“. I wrote it this way because conservatives who adhere to trickle down don’t understand the difference between the two, or if they do, are purposely misusing the word “theory” to help their cause.

Hypothesis: A suggested explanation for an observable phenomenon or prediction of a possible causal correlation among multiple phenomena.

Based on: Suggestion, possibility, projection or prediction, but the result is uncertain.

Theory: In science, a theory is a well-substantiated, unifying explanation for a set of verified, proven hypotheses.

Based on: Evidence, verification, repeated testing, wide scientific consensus.

Clearly, Trickle Down has never been verified by a wide scientific consensus, therefore it is not a provable Theory.

See the full chart here.

Kurt Vonnegut — Slaughterhouse-Five

Still relevant today. #QuoteoftheDay

“America is the wealthiest nation on Earth, but its people are mainly poor, and poor Americans are urged to hate themselves. To quote the American humorist Kin Hubbard, ‘It ain’t no disgrace to be poor, but it might as well be.’ It is in fact a crime for an American to be poor, even though America is a nation of poor. Every other nation has folk traditions of men who were poor but extremely wise and virtuous, and therefore more estimable than anyone with power and gold. No such tales are told by the American poor. They mock themselves and glorify their betters. The meanest eating or drinking establishment, owned by a man who is himself poor, is very likely to have a sign on its wall asking this cruel question: ‘if you’re so smart, why ain’t you rich?’ There will also be an American flag no larger than a child’s hand – glued to a lollipop stick and flying from the cash register.

Americans, like human beings everywhere, believe many things that are obviously untrue. Their most destructive untruth is that it is very easy for any American to make money. They will not acknowledge how in fact hard money is to come by, and, therefore, those who have no money blame and blame and blame themselves. This inward blame has been a treasure for the rich and powerful, who have had to do less for their poor, publicly and privately, than any other ruling class since, say Napoleonic times. Many novelties have come from America. The most startling of these, a thing without precedent, is a mass of undignified poor. They do not love one another because they do not love themselves.”